Humans have long trapped animals in cages, nets and snares, but the tangled webs of vanity, curiosity, cruelty and fear we cast over other creatures may be even more perilous. We see our virtues and vices reflected in animals — hardworking beavers, indolent sloths, innocent lambs, greedy vultures — through a glass darkly. But these well-worn clichés blind us to a world far more dazzling and varied, according to Lucy Cooke, the acclaimed zoology-trained author and documentary filmmaker, in her new book, "The Truth About Animals." As she writes, "Painting the animal kingdom with our artificial ethical brush denies us the astonishing diversity of life, in all of its blood-drinking, sibling-eating, corpse-shagging glory." (Yes, corpse shagging. The penguin portion is not for the faint of heart.)
In 13 breezy chapters, each devoted to a misunderstood creature, Cooke collects some of our most crackpot notions (and the equally startling truths) about animals. She nimbly pings between arcane, medieval and modern sources, assembling a cast of characters that includes unhinged aristocrats, ill-fated adventurers, Thomas Jefferson, Julius Caesar, Sigmund Freud, the Colombian drug lord Pablo Escobar, the Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe and more than a few mad scientists.
Image
Aristotle believed the courage of animals corresponds to the heat of their blood; European scientists contended that frogs hatch from wet clay, caterpillars from cabbage and eels from drops of dew. Others theorized that migrating swallows spend winters underwater or on the moon. The real animal behavior Cooke reports is often even more extraordinary. Researchers have recently observed chimpanzees dancing in the rain, fashioning spears to hunt bush babies and playing with sticks they cradle and put to bed like dolls.
Cooke unearths old beliefs and debunks modern-day myths with humor and panache. Pandas, we learn, are not bumbling fluff balls too busy being cute to breed in captivity. Elaborate matchmaking efforts at zoos say more about us and our obsessive meddling than the bears, which are known to mate more than 40 times in a single afternoon in the wild. And bats — popularly believed to be blind, bloodsucking, disease-bearing rats with wings — are more "Buddha than Beelzebub." They see perfectly well, are very rarely rabid and share more DNA with us than they do with rodents, and only three species are vampiric. They are also among the few animals to engage in oral sex, a fact Cooke presents as one of their "porn-star credentials."
The book is big on bawdy humor, and while it's not that weird mating habits and giant genitalia aren't funny, Cooke describes the "ins and outs" of animal sex with a glee normally found among middle schoolers. (Gonads inspire some of the most blindingly painful puns and rhymes; a debate over beaver testicles becomes the "fluster over the beaver's cluster.")
Cooke's appetite for the salacious sometimes overwhelms her sensitivity, as it does in her account of Maurice K. Temerlin, an American psychology professor who reared a chimpanzee named Lucy in his suburban home. At first Lucy is a model "daughter" who uses silverware and raises a kitten. Temerlin, disturbingly, then begins to fix her cocktails. Soon Lucy is fixing herself cocktails. When she takes to masturbating with the vacuum cleaner, Temerlin responds by buying her Playgirl and even participating in one of these sessions to "see what would happen." (Nothing, mercifully.) When Lucy eventually grows too unruly, Temerlin offloads her in Gambia, where she is flayed and butchered by poachers. A story like this is worth analyzing for what it might reveal about anthropomorphism at the edge. Cooke, however, plays it for laughs.
The fraught history of humans and animals has lately been the focus of expanding scholarship, insightful meditations such as John Berger's influential essay "Why Look at Animals?" and environmentalist critiques. Cooke, however, attempts neither to probe its complexities nor to sound apocalyptic alarms (though she does, dutifully, note the impact of human carelessness and mass consumption on other species). She is not plumbing the depths; she is riding the thermals. Her pace is quick, her touch is light, and through her wealth of research we can reach new heights of wonder.
Friday, 25 May 2018
Monday, 23 April 2018
Live exports review: animal welfare groups criticise vet's appointment
Animal welfare organisations have indicated that they are concerned about a perceived conflict of interest of a veterinarian appointed to conduct a review into conditions experienced by sheep on live export ships during the Middle Eastern summer.
Dr Michael McCarthy was appointed by the agriculture minister, David Littleproud, to conduct the review on 10 April, two days after 60 Minutes aired footage of sheep suffering extreme distress on the Emanuel Exports stocked ship Awassi Express, which left Fremantle on 1 August 2017 and lost 2,400 sheep to heat stress.
McCarthy has more than 30 years experience as a livestock veterinarian and has worked most of his career in the live export trade.
Liberal MP to introduce bill to ban live exports as industry agrees to more oversight
Read more
He has acted as shipboard veterinarian on 65 live export voyages for eight major Australian exporters, including Emanuel Exports, conducted industry-funded research for Meat and Livestock Australia and Livecorp, and acted as an expert consultant for Murdoch University and the University of Queensland.
Animal welfare groups say McCarthy is extremely knowledgeable about the industry but his extensive working history as a paid contractor to the live export industry created a perceived conflict of interest.
The RSPCA, Animals Australia and Vets Against Live Export (VALE) wrote separately to Littleproud raising concerns about McCarthy's appointment.
VALE spokeswoman Sue Foster said McCarthy was a well-published researcher who had made recommendations for change in the past, although those recommendations had not been taken up by the industry.
But she said his extensive work history with key live exporters, including Emanuel Exports, whose conduct sparked the review, created a possible conflict of interest.
"VALE has concerns about the independence of the review given the long-term association and employment that vet has in the live export industry," Foster told Guardian Australia.
The RSPCA said it did not questions McCarthy's scientific credentials but said "we were surprised that they had appointed someone who was so reliant on industry funding".
Animals Australia said the review should have been co-chaired by Australia's chief veterinary officer.
McCarthy declined to comment when contacted by Guardian Australia.
Littleproud said McCarthy's review would be "absolutely independent".
"Animal welfare groups regularly cite Dr McCarthy's research in their arguments and some were consulted prior to him being consulted," Littleproud said, adding that McCarthy would consult with animal welfare organisations as part of the review.
"Appointing a vet who had never had any involvement with live export to perform a review of conditions on live export boats would be a ridiculous waste of taxpayer money.
"The reviews I've ordered after being in the job just three months will be done by eminent and fiercely independent people."
33 years on, a long-term solution to live export trade remains elusive
Read more
Neither Animals Australia, nor the RSPCA, nor VALE said they were consulted specifically about McCarthy's appointment.
Labor has called for an immediate suspension of the live sheep export trade until the McCarthy review is completed. It has also called for a three-month ban during the hottest months in the Persian Gulf.
The final report is due on 11 May.
Littleproud has said that he will support an end to the summer trade if that is what McCarthy recommends, saying on Friday that: "If I am looking at evidence that Dr McCarthy comes back with that says there is no way in any sense that this could be undertaken then we have to listen to that."
Dr Michael McCarthy was appointed by the agriculture minister, David Littleproud, to conduct the review on 10 April, two days after 60 Minutes aired footage of sheep suffering extreme distress on the Emanuel Exports stocked ship Awassi Express, which left Fremantle on 1 August 2017 and lost 2,400 sheep to heat stress.
McCarthy has more than 30 years experience as a livestock veterinarian and has worked most of his career in the live export trade.
Liberal MP to introduce bill to ban live exports as industry agrees to more oversight
Read more
He has acted as shipboard veterinarian on 65 live export voyages for eight major Australian exporters, including Emanuel Exports, conducted industry-funded research for Meat and Livestock Australia and Livecorp, and acted as an expert consultant for Murdoch University and the University of Queensland.
Animal welfare groups say McCarthy is extremely knowledgeable about the industry but his extensive working history as a paid contractor to the live export industry created a perceived conflict of interest.
The RSPCA, Animals Australia and Vets Against Live Export (VALE) wrote separately to Littleproud raising concerns about McCarthy's appointment.
VALE spokeswoman Sue Foster said McCarthy was a well-published researcher who had made recommendations for change in the past, although those recommendations had not been taken up by the industry.
But she said his extensive work history with key live exporters, including Emanuel Exports, whose conduct sparked the review, created a possible conflict of interest.
"VALE has concerns about the independence of the review given the long-term association and employment that vet has in the live export industry," Foster told Guardian Australia.
The RSPCA said it did not questions McCarthy's scientific credentials but said "we were surprised that they had appointed someone who was so reliant on industry funding".
Animals Australia said the review should have been co-chaired by Australia's chief veterinary officer.
McCarthy declined to comment when contacted by Guardian Australia.
Littleproud said McCarthy's review would be "absolutely independent".
"Animal welfare groups regularly cite Dr McCarthy's research in their arguments and some were consulted prior to him being consulted," Littleproud said, adding that McCarthy would consult with animal welfare organisations as part of the review.
"Appointing a vet who had never had any involvement with live export to perform a review of conditions on live export boats would be a ridiculous waste of taxpayer money.
"The reviews I've ordered after being in the job just three months will be done by eminent and fiercely independent people."
33 years on, a long-term solution to live export trade remains elusive
Read more
Neither Animals Australia, nor the RSPCA, nor VALE said they were consulted specifically about McCarthy's appointment.
Labor has called for an immediate suspension of the live sheep export trade until the McCarthy review is completed. It has also called for a three-month ban during the hottest months in the Persian Gulf.
The final report is due on 11 May.
Littleproud has said that he will support an end to the summer trade if that is what McCarthy recommends, saying on Friday that: "If I am looking at evidence that Dr McCarthy comes back with that says there is no way in any sense that this could be undertaken then we have to listen to that."
Friday, 23 March 2018
Rossmore veterinary hospital to house Camden animals
Camden Council is expected to continue utisilising Rossmore Veterinary Hospital to impound the area's lost and unwanted pets for a further two years.
Councillors will vote to adopt the hospital for continued use at this Tuesday's council meeting.
Camden Council used Renbury Farm, in Austral, for its pound services until late 2016, when the site was sold.
Negotiations with Campbelltown Council to use its pound facilities fell apart in 2017, causing the council to look elsewhere.
Rossmore Veterinary Hospital was selected for a short-term trial in June last year, ahead of a call for tenders to provide an impound service.
The centre applied for the tender, which council staff have recommended be approved.
A report said the hospital was aligned with the council's view on impounded animals.
"The intention of the tender was to appoint a contractor with the ability to provide core animal impounding and veterinary services, demonstrate complying facilities and demonstrate strong corporate and social responsibility to deliver on council's adopted 'no kill' policy in operating its animal care facility," the report read.
The council was looking for a facility to house both companion animals and livestock, however no applications were received to cater for livestock.
The council will continue to seek a suitable location to impound livestock.
The report praised the Rossmore facility for making the site more comfortable for animals.
"Since June 1, there have been more than 140 dogs and 70 cats from Camden LGA pass through Rossmore Veterinary Hospital," the report stated.
"In this time, council officers and the hospital have built a productive and professional working relationship.
"Rossmore vets have facilitated a number of improvements including the installation of blinds on the kennels and a new air-conditioning unit in the cattery.
"Importantly, Rossmore vets have worked closely with council officers to promote and market impounded animals to give them the best opportunity of being rehomed."
The council will continue to "investigate long-term options for our growing community".
Friday, 26 January 2018
Animals worldwide stick close to home when humans move in
Animals living in landscapes used intensively by people travel, on average, only half to one-third as far as animals in more remote areas do — a pattern that's consistent across dozens of species worldwide. The finding, published today in Science1, has implications for important ecological processes linked to animal movement, such as seed transport and nutrient cycling. And it could spell trouble for the animals themselves as the climate changes.
More than 100 scientists around the world shared satellite-tracking data for 803 mammals from 57 species, from impala (Aepyceros melampus) to olive baboons (Papio anubis) and grizzly bears (Ursus arctos). The data charted the animals' movements over timescales of up to ten days, and were correlated with a Human Footprint Index that measures how deeply our species has impacted a place, using metrics such as population density and the presence of roads and night-time lights.
There's likely to be more than one explanation for the animals' reduced mobility, says Marlee Tucker, a macro-ecologist at Goethe University in Frankfurt, Germany, who led the study. "Some animals might be sort of trapped, caught in fragments that are suitable for them, surrounded by a landscape that is not suitable — a road, a fence or a lot of people." But others might be tethering themselves to attractive resources, such as edible crops or water sources intended for livestock.
Sticking close to calories
That helps to explain the behaviour of a herd of elk (Cervus elaphus) near Banff National Park in Canada tracked by ecologist Mark Hebblewhite of the University of Montana in Missoula. Many have stopped migrating between summer and winter range. "They've given up their old wild ways," Hebblewhite says. The same dynamic is playing out with migrating ungulates across the western United States and Canada, Hebblewhite says. Many now spend the summer feasting on irrigated alfalfa crops in areas they once abandoned in warm months. "The point of migrating was to get access to what's under that [sprinkler] in August" — calories."
Reduced movement can affect ecosystems because it means that seeds and nutrients in dung might not be spread so widely, or because herbivores such as elk graze smaller areas more intensively. It can affect the animals, as well: crowding together in a small area could increase the risk of disease. "It is definitely concerning," Tucker says.
Conservation biologist Reed Noss, president of the Florida Institute for Conservation Science in Chuluota, says the findings underscore the importance of corridors of land that allow wildlife to move between core areas of habitat. As the climate changes and the seas rise, these features enable animals to search widely for food and mates — and eventually seek more hospitable climates.
A helping hand
Where human barriers such as roads and cities can't be perforated with wildlife corridors, or where animals can't move quickly enough to keep up with changes in their environment, some species may need help moving, Noss says. "It seems like we will have little choice but to intervene if we don't want to lose species."
Hebblewhite says that knowing that human activity is reducing species movement "galvanizes" him to fight for more wildlife-friendly open space —even rail-thin corridors — to help animals roam. "It is going to be tough to make big new protected areas in the twenty-first century," he says. But it is possible to build new connections, such as wildlife overpasses across highways, and to protect existing slivers of habitat criss-crossing cities and farms that can serve as corridors. Even convincing ranchers to leave their gates open in the winter when cattle aren't around can help, says Hebblewhite, by allowing pronghorn antelope to migrate with the seasons.
Tucker adds that migration is one of the world's great natural wonders and deserves to be protected for its own sake. "It would be a real shame if we modified the landscape so much that you didn't have that joy of knowing that the animals travelled so far," she says. "And nature documentaries wouldn't have that great footage anymore.
Sunday, 24 December 2017
Why do Polish animals talk on Christmas Eve?
If you have a dog, cat, or other animal around at midnight on Christmas Eve, listen up!
According to legend, this is the one night of the year when they gain the magical ability to speak.
Where does this myth come from? While there is no definite answer, scholars have offered a few possibilities.
Some connect it to a tale that the farm animals which surrounded St. Mary on the first Christmas bowed to the baby Jesus when he was born.
Others trace its origins even further back, to the ancient Roman festival Saturnalia. During this week-long winter holiday, social roles were reversed – most famously, it was during this time that masters traditionally served their slaves.
As with many fairy tales, some of the stories are quite dark. For example, some say that the only people who can hear animals speak are fated soon to die. Other legends even say that the animals speak to each other to plot revenge against neglectful owners.
Now, though, the myth is observed lightheartedly in Poland and some other European countries on Christmas Eve.
For example, asked if she expected her hamster, Kwant, to say anything, high schooler Michalina Smoleń replies, "I hope not! His favorite tidbits were finished a month ago… and he is not happy."
Neuropsychology student Ania Starowicz reports that her cat Jerry would probably say, "I hate you."
And then? "‘I love you.' He's bipolar."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




